I wrote a letter to the e-mail address shown in this report
to advise them the report was irrelevant (see below).
The post above makes the following points:
Note closely the references to the UN, to the Royal Society etc. And to
'global warming' etc. Eugenics, oops, 'engineering'. And notice the following
from the lunatics behind these chemtrails -
If cloud seeding occurred during a planting season,
it would mean the loss of an entire year of
understanding of impacts may not occur until long after the act
indictors might use socio-economic indicators (such as income) or human health
markers (such as infant mortality).
Pidgeon, N F, et al (2009)
Deliberating the risks of nanotechnology for energy and health applications in
the US and UK. Nature Nanotechnology, Vol 4, Feb 2009, 95–98; Engineering and
Physical Sciences Research Council, Nanotechnologies for the Targeted
Delivery of Therapeutic Agents & Nanotechnologies for Diagnostics: Summary
of Public Consultation Findings (Swindon: EPSRC, 2008).
Here is the letter I wrote.
] Sent:28 April 2010 18:34 To:'
' Subject:Large Scale
Geoengineering Already Employed
Heck, who would've ever
though that Weather Control Technology was already in use? Who would have
thought it was used on 9/11? Almost no one, of course - which is why you have
probably never heard about this data before.
Your problem is that is
impossible for you to keep up with the vast amount of information available on
the web - and people who have their eyes, ears, cameras and video cameras "ready
and able" - see below for examples.
I look forward to your
sweeping this under the intellectual carpet - whilst others realise its
significance and witness, as I have, your credibility dwindle away...
You think anyone takes
Hadley CRU seriously anymore? I certainly don't