In this presentation we will examine a range
of different evidence which seems to show that much of what we were told and
shown about the Apollo Moon shot programme was false/fake. We will look at
We will also ask
questions such as “how they could possibly have got away with it”.
- Some aspects of Apollo History
- Photographic Evidence
- Video Evidence
- What some of the Astronauts themselves have said – during and after the Apollo missions
- New Evidence from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter - LRO
- Likely motives for the fakery
Note: Not all questions can be answered, but the evidence presented raises some serious and deep questions about the Apollo Record and the actions and statements of some of those who were directly involved. Please see minor corrections at bottom
An astute reader/listener adds a correction and some additional thoughts:
One small item of language and meaning: When Armstrong said when we "lost
the competition", I heard him to mean that our competitors were lost
(meaning: now gone because we won, we smoked them, they were defeated etc), not
to mean that we had lost the contest. It is an American colloquialism perhaps-
to use the term "The Competition" to refer to the competitors, as distinct from
using the term "the competition" to refer to the match or the game.
I see a few possibilities, listed in order of probability (in my opinion)
from lowest to highest:
1. the official story is true and genuine: Apollo mission happened exactly
as stated and shown. (you did a great job in showing why this is not a
2. the official story is partly true and genuine, but not the way it was
stated and shown: We did go to the moon on Apollo, but were shown faked Kubrick
staged films and pictures because they did not want us to see what is really in
space and on the moon, or reveal methods and equipment to "the competition".
The astronauts were memory wiped so that they would never reveal the truth. (I
think this idea was essentially embraced by Hoagland in Dark Mission) This could
be their "limited hangout" story.
3. the official story is completely false: We never went to the moon at all
with the Apollo missions, but faked the entire program from low space orbit plus
Kubrick staged films and photos, etc. Apollo mission astronauts were memory
wiped. We cannot go to the moon in conventional rockets because of Van Allen
Belt radiation. Instead the Apollo program was a ruse to capture the public's
imagination and invested belief in low-tech rocketry development, during which a
parallel, secret space program based on hyper dimensional physics, free energy
technology was developed. The program, using black project funding, probably
resulted in super advanced tech electro-gravitic spacecraft that can travel
freely within the solar system if not farther. (this is the Nazi based
"breakaway" civilization that Hoagland, Dolan, Farrell, etc are now talking
about). So we (they) have gone to the moon, but not the way we
thought we did.
There could also be an exo-political explanation for all this as well,
impenetrable for now.
It has been pointed out to me by someone who would not reveal their real name that I have probably made a mistake in the segment about the LRO images. I am still trying to check the details, but in the section where I compare Google Map/Google Earth images of my house to the LRO image, I have probably (without realising iit at the time) used an aerial
photograph (i.e. taken from a plane - not a satellite) for the images of my house. This anonymous person (who then wanted to engage me in other arguments - without revealing much about himself) So, the level of detail is not totally fair. However, as Jarah White has noted, comparing GeoEye images to LRO Apollo images IS a fair comparison, as they are meant to be the same resolution. See here.
Additionally, I calculated the size of the Apollo 11 LEM image from LRO
incorrectly. Although the image size on the LRO image is actually correct, the lack of detail and colour or even much shade variation also remain valid.
The "mushyness" and overly high contrast of that image is still a valid
References/Links from Slides