Home arrow Other arrow Articles arrow Was Paul McCartney "Replaced" By a "Double" in 1966?
Was Paul McCartney "Replaced" By a "Double" in 1966? PDF Print E-mail

Andrew Johnson ( This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

21 Jan 2012 (Revised in days following to add details and correct typos etc)

(29 Apr 2916 - See Update at Bottom)

Some years ago, I came across some evidence that Paul McCartney had been "replaced" by a "double" - some time in 1966. Paul was replaced by "Faul". This is, again, one of those stories which people can snort with laughter at, as it just seems unbelievable for so many reasons. A close member of my family who, like me, is a fan of the Beatles found it very difficult (impossible even) to entertain the notion that McCartney could have been replaced. Who can blame him - watching things like "Anthology" or any of the numerous Beatles-related documentaries and interviews makes is hard to believe that "Faul" could have the memories that were really Paul's.

Nevertheless, the physical evidence is quite compelling - as shown in this detailed analysis here I have reproduced a small portion of this below.

(With the Beatles-1963+Yesterday and Today-66)      (Sgt. Pepper + Spies Like Us)
Watch the ears, nose and chin closely - the distance between the eyes has been equalized , and you have already seen that this comparison should be an almost perfectly clean crossfade. But instead, the nose changes in length and width, the chin changes dramatically from an almost perfectly symmetrical one with a cleft straight down the middle

And then, there are discrepancies with changes in height (about 2 inches), ear anomalies and even eye colour! Analysis of voice prints (admissible in court) also appears to reveal differences between Paul pre-1966 and post 1966.

But what does the evidence show? Is the above just "cherry picking"? What are the things that are "glossed over"? You won't know until you've looked, will you?

Interview with Tina Foster re "Faul and Paul"

Thanks to a link sent by a friend, I found out about a comprehensive blog detailing a number of areas of evidence which seem to show there is more to this than backmasking, reverse speech and rumour. You can find the blog at . As I was troubled by this issue, I asked Tina if she would record a Podcast with me, which she kindly agreed to do on 21st Jan 2012. You can listen and download using the links below.

Download - Tina Foster - Faul - PID - Discussion of the Evidence - 21 Jan 2012 

Tina contends that Paul was switched with Faul between about the 26th and 28th of August 1966. However, I wonder if it happened at the end or after their tour of America. It is hard to believe and hard to accept that they other band members, friends and so on would either not have known this or would have known and "gone along" with what transpired. We discuss some of these troubling issues in the interview.

"Do You Want to Know A Secret... Do You Promise Not to Tell..."

Added to the facial evidence, we have a catalogue of strange remarks made by John Lennon, Heather Mills and others close to McCartney.

Paul has himself made strange remarks about "another him", which could easily be interpreted innocently - referring, perhaps, to how much one's life changes over time. But do they have a deeper, more sinister meaning? On their own, they prove nothing, but knowing "operating procedures" of the Secret Apparatus which runs all major affairs on Planet Earth, we can see that this may be one of those scenarios in which they "give us clues" as to what they are doing behind the scenes.

We also have a number of untimely deaths - Brian Epstein and of course John Lennon and George Harrison. But other deaths are not that well known about - such as the death of Mal Evans, a "roadie" for the Beatles, .

I found Heather Mills remarks on GMTV on Nov 1 2007 to be very interesting - and whatever their meaning, she does an excellent job of illustrating the role of the media in "dealing with" any "nails that stick up" which need "bashing down".

If you're short on time, the key remarks are in part 2 at about 3 min 14s in.

"Getting By With a Little Help From My Friends"

I have to be honest and say that one thing that really gave me the creeps was McCartney "buddying up" to Obama and taking a swipe at those who question the AGW Agenda - and those who question other "official truths".

The Beatles legend said:

"Sadly we need disasters like this to show people. Some people don't believe in climate warming — like those who don't believe there was a Holocaust."

He also said:

"It was such an honour. I'd heard of the prize — it's the biggest for popular music in the US. When the President gave it to me, I was so touched. I'm a huge Obama supporter. I really love him.

Prize ... Paul shows off Gershwin gong

Prize ... Paul shows off Gershwin gong

Penny Lane in the Whitehouse

McCartney Sings to Michelle Obama

If you can find a film called "The US Versus John Lennon" and the consider its content, and also that Lennon returned an MBE he was awarded in protest, you will perhaps share my feelings of concern at this sort of "hobnobbing" by McCartney - or Faul.

And just why was it so Newsworthy that McCartney visited Bethlehem in 2008? What can that have meant?

For me, if for no one else, it shows that whether he is Faul, or really is Paul, he has become successfully embedded in the program of lies and deceit - and his celebrity status has been used to further this agenda.

[Additional thought: From the comments above and P/Faul's behaviour, I have to also consider that some type of mind control might also explain some of what is mentioned/described above and below. One can consider that the MKUltra programme was in operation during the 1960's . However, I still regard the collection of evidence here as quite compelling, that the "original Paul" was physically replaced. ]

"Paul" McCartney's reaction to the news of John Lennon's Death

Paul McCartney Honoured in a Ceremony - 08 Sep 2012

 Not often you see Facca in a dark suit and black tie... 

Update: 29 Apr 2016

Last week, someone wrote to me say they’d worked out who Paul’s double was. I found his article really interesting. He sent this article to Miles Mathis, who had also written about John Lennon:

(very long, but worth reading and checking the photos and short videos). Based on the research about McCartney’s double, Mathis then posted this:

Also worth reading – as it reveals something I never knew – Paul McCartney had a twin brother…

To add more confusion, at least one person has said that Paul's replacement was William Shepherd - which seems more plausible from a musical perspective...



Interview with Nick Kollerstrom: Starts at 14:29 or thereabouts:

*** PLEASE *** SHARE ON FACEBOOK ETC!Facebook!StumbleUpon!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites! title=
< Prev   Next >